When the Supreme Court rules on a case how many agree votes are needed to reach a verdict?
When the Supreme Court rules on a case, how many ” agree ” votes are needed to reach a verdict? The Chief Justice’s opinion is the verdict. A simple majority is needed. A 2/3 majority is needed.
When a judge analyzes law what document is used to determine the law’s validity?
Answer: US constitution is the correct answer. Explanation: Article 6, Clause 2 (The Supremacy Clause) of US constitution declares constitution to be the supreme law of USA and makes the federal laws consistent with it.
What stolen Valorpt to prohibit lying about a military service lying about crimes lie about receiving a military medal of honor lie about being honorably discharged from the military?
Answer: The answer is: Lying about receiving a military medal of honor. Explanation: The Stolen Value Law makes it a federal crime to lie for having received a military medal or medal, punishable by up to one year in prison if the crime involves the highest honors of the military.
How Long Will Supreme Court hearing last?
Unless otherwise noted, the Court generally hears two, one-hour oral arguments, with attorneys for each side of a case given 30 minutes to make a presentation to the Court and answer questions posed by the Justices. These sessions are open to the public.
How does a case get to the Supreme Court steps?
“Original jurisdiction” cases are rare, with the Court hearing one or two cases each term. The most common way for a case to reach the Supreme Court is on appeal from a circuit court. A party seeking to appeal a decision of a circuit court can file a petition to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari.
What is the major difference between the majority and dissenting opinions on false speech and the Stolen Valor Act quizlet?
E2020 Sample response: The majority writes that false speech is protected as long as it does not cause harm. The writer worries that the Stolen Valor Act would set a dangerous precedent for future laws. The dissent believes that false speech is rarely protected by the First Amendment, and the Act is constitutional.
Can I wear my grandads medals?
When is OK to wear my relatives medals? War medals and service decorations of any sort may be worn only by the person upon whom they were conferred, and in no case does the right to wear war or service medals, or their ribbons, pass to any relative when the recipient is dead.
Is it illegal to wear medals you haven’t earned?
While it is not an offence to own medals which have not been awarded to you, it is illegal under section 197 of the Army Act 1955 to use these to pretend to be a member of the armed forces. The act makes wearing any military decoration, badge, wound stripe or emblem without authority a criminal offence.
Is it illegal to wear military medals?
The Act made it illegal for unauthorized persons to wear, buy, sell, barter, trade, or manufacture “any decoration or medal authorized by Congress for the armed forces of the United States, or any of the service medals or badges awarded to the members of such forces.” In the 18 months after the act was enacted, the
What is the first step in deciding Supreme Court cases?
Assuming the case is capable of being heard by the U.S. Supreme Court, the first step, most of the time, is to file a lawsuit in your local state or federal court. The trial judge would hear evidence and consider legal arguments from each side before making a decision.
What is the Supreme Court most important role?
Role. The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution.
How does the Supreme Court overturn a decision?
When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional issue, that judgment is virtually final; its decisions can be altered only by the rarely used procedure of constitutional amendment or by a new ruling of the Court. However, when the Court interprets a statute, new legislative action can be taken.